Here's one...http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showt...ghlight=fatkid
The above one has a nice overall look, but I prefer the asthetics of the "halo" front, like this...http://thisdysfunctional.org/kids/album26/DSC00142.jpg
Printable View
Here's one...http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showt...ghlight=fatkid
The above one has a nice overall look, but I prefer the asthetics of the "halo" front, like this...http://thisdysfunctional.org/kids/album26/DSC00142.jpg
....so is that to say that HREW is unsafe?
I have not changed my position. I built Lynda's cage with DOM and learned the HUGE differnce between the two while pulling the handle on the bender... Her rig is heavy, mine is light.
I roller her rig HARD with ZERO distortion in the cage - that stuff isn't even thinking about bending unless going at high speeds (which we don't do)
I've bent (from rocks, rolling, or a crane...) several pieces of tube on the Patrol but long story short - it is adaquate to protect you in a roll - even in a significant roll. It might distort and require a new cage, BUT - it will protect you.
While offroading - I purposfully stay away from situations that could result in "significant" roll down a hill - I just pull the winch. It's just not worth the risk. I have no problems with laying the rig on it's side or even a slow roll on the lid - not a big deal.
Three reasons the "new" tube on the Patrol will be DOM
1) I have more money
2) I'm using it for the frame
3) I might make new sliders (mine are bent) and the DOM holds up better to the beating on the rocks.
SO - HREW is fine as long as the cage design, welds, and tube fits are done properly. DOM is better but not needed in most applications (low speed)
does .120 wall HREW actually measure .120? .120 DOM definitely looks thicker than .120 HREW, and pulling the handle on the bender is waaaaay harder. Maybe it has something to do with the ratings...like DOM is at least .120 and HREW is closer to actually .120?
what?
Disregarding that they are both called .120 wall, is .120 wall DOM is thicker than .120 wall HREW?
no, they are both .120
keep in mind tubing is used for more than just cages and indexed off the ID or OD so if its not consistant with the size its junk
so two pieces of tubing, both 1.75" OD, both .120" wall, both mild steel, one HREW and one DOM and somehow the DOM is thicker and heavier. Guess the welded seam saves weight? :)
In my opinion, Everyone thinks the seemless or DOM process has better wall control, it doesn't. DOM, Drawn over mandrel is made by extruding a billet of steel over a piercing point. It is very hard to maintain a constant wall thickness via this method. On the other hand HREW is made by rolling a strip of metal into a tube.
With HREW you can start off with 0.120 thick plate and roll it and have very consistent wall. With DOM a manufacturer will intentionally "roll heavy" or have a thicker wall to insure that it is atleast .120 all around, so one side might be .130 while the other is .120 I think that is why DOM is heavier.
The other difference is how much you trust the weld process that links the HREW together. I could see where that might have some internal stress built into it.
Just my 2 cents.
jones is that you?
ok but let me send you an email making fun of jones for stating the same thing first:flipoff2:
Holey fawkiin shiat! Real tech! Thanks!
I've always have read on the internet, that DOM starts life off as HREW and then has the drawn over mandrel pipe.
Karl however works in this industry and knows how to lay pipe!
karl are you confusing seamless and DOM? I've ordered both dom and seamless pipe and there were big price differences, but that was stainless and a long time ago. It was some indian mfg if you want to check the pipe network
Don't they sometimes call DOM "seamless"? Though it seems like I have heard of both DOM seamless and extruded seamless
I'm pretty sure DOM is just HREW thats went through a mandrel afterwards which cold rolls it making it stronger
I believe DOM is welded tube that has had a mandrel pulled though it. Karl is referring to seamless tube. There is an argument in the tube industry over which is stronger. It is generally accepted that seamless is stronger but but can be argued the other way. The seamless people say the welds on welded tube are a weak point. The welded people say the welded tube is stronger because of more consistent wall thickness as Karl explained above. The good stuff will not show a seam anyway. We keep both in stock at work. I use the welded unless specified otherwise. If either was crap we would have blown it up by now.
I take back my previous statement, DOM is HREW that is drawn through a mandrel. This thereby makes my theory of why DOM would be heavier a flaming pile of ****.....
I see no reason why DOM should weigh more than HREW.
DOM should not weigh more, but I promise, it is significantly stronger. A big enough difference that you can tell real quick what you are pulling on in a bender.
why dont we all just use square tube for our cages and frames like the square drive shaft kids?
You die! You die and go to hell!
I used both chromoly and dom for my new cage and other tubework. The chromoly is a little stronger and lighter with .095" wall thickness compared to the .120 dom. Regardless they're both strong, the main gain is in weight saving.
Ed Zachary - Cromo is for long haired pretty boys who....er wait. :flipoff2:
I was thinking about square tube cages the other day when I was looking at all the ROPS's on tractors. Then you could pin it and make it removeable!
i figured this can go here. is that square tube?
http://www.fourwheeler.com/eventcove.../photo_01.html