sure, when?
Printable View
sure, when?
won't be in town tomorrow, busy next week? my first round of tests will be over by wednesday afternoon
Either way, I would run a couple of down bars through the back of the cab an into the bed. I think Option A would be a little more difficult to bend up, but you have the braintrust that is Jones, so you should be good.
No, I am not putting anymore bracing in that is the entire cage....
Oh, **** captain obvious just called and said I should put more bracing in. Guess I will.
My question was does it make a difference if you run the main hoops front to back vs. side to side.
option A. Its shorter so if you **** it up you are out less material. It will also be easier to place in the vehicle.
Karl is angry, i guess the house didnt shake on sunday night:)
Flem I think the bends are off from what is stamped on the die because of the memory the steel has and the springback. i know why my bender and the DOM that I have the bend "springs" back almost 10 degrees
I don't think springback would change the radius
from what little I've read on CNC equipment they account for this by either adding a preset additional degree of bend, or by punching in the modulus of elasticity to the cam software and its calculated from there. They still have radii consistant with the die specs. Some crazy expensive benders have a coil to induction heat the tube right before the die.
Maybe the difference in springback between DOM/HREW/Chromolly and such is what might give you a different radius?
I dont know of any strength differences between the two but I am planning on going with option A because a) it looks easier to fabricate b) trees get caught in the part of the bend that sticks out to the side past the horizontal brace on A and c) it looks more aesthetically pleasing.
I would do a C pillar hoop, a B pillar hoop, and then braces between B and C, and then arms go down from B to the floor and put a winshield and dash gross bar in. Seems easier than bending in two planes for an A hoop.