Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Stupid river beds bill passed

  1. #1
    Rex
    Guest

    Unhappy Riverbeds bill passed

    A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

    AN ACT

    relating to the protection of the natural condition of the beds and
    banks of state-owned watercourses; providing civil and criminal
    penalties.
    BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
    SECTION 1. Title 11, Natural Resources Code, is amended by
    adding Chapter 212 to read as follows:

    CHAPTER 212. PROTECTION OF NATURAL CONDITION OF BEDS AND BANKS

    OF STATE-OWNED WATERCOURSES
    Sec. 212.001. POWER TO ADOPT AND ENFORCE RULES. (a) A river
    authority may adopt and enforce rules to:
    (1) limit or prohibit vehicular access to and use of
    the beds and banks of the state-owned watercourses within the
    authority's boundaries in order to protect the natural condition of
    the beds and banks against disturbance; and
    (2) prohibit within the beds and banks of the
    state-owned watercourses within the authority's boundaries
    littering, destruction of aquatic habitat, pollution, and
    activities endangering the public safety.
    (b) A river authority may not adopt rules under Subsection
    (a)(1) limiting or prohibiting vehicular access to and use of the
    beds and banks of state-owned watercourses by an owner of the
    adjacent uplands or an agent, employee, representative, or lessee
    of the owner for reasonable purposes related to usual and customary
    agricultural operations if the vehicular access and use is limited
    to those reaches of the watercourse adjacent to the owner's
    property.
    (c) Rules adopted under this section do not affect the use
    of the beds and banks of state-owned watercourses for:
    (1) emergency or rescue operations; or
    (2) activities specifically authorized by the state or
    a political subdivision of the state acting under state law.
    Sec. 212.002. CIVIL PENALTY; INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. (a) A
    person who violates a rule adopted by a river authority under
    Section 212.001 is liable to the river authority for a civil penalty
    of not less than $50 or more than $1,000 for each violation. Each
    day a violation continues is considered a separate violation for
    purposes of assessing the civil penalty. The river authority may
    sue to collect the penalty.
    (b) A river authority may sue to enjoin a violation or
    threatened violation of a rule adopted under Section 212.001.
    (c) A river authority may sue for injunctive relief and a
    civil penalty in the same proceeding.
    (d) A suit under this section must be brought in a district
    court in the county in which the violation occurred or is
    threatened.
    Sec. 212.003. CRIMINAL PENALTY. (a) A person commits an
    offense if the person violates a rule adopted under Section
    212.001.
    (b) An offense under this section is a Class B misdemeanor.
    SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2003.





    By: Puente H.B. No. 305


    A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

    AN ACT

    relating to the protection of public freshwater areas; providing a
    penalty.
    BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
    SECTION 1. Title 5, Parks and Wildlife Code, is amended by
    adding Subtitle I to read as follows:

    SUBTITLE I. PROTECTED FRESHWATER AREAS

    CHAPTER 90. ACCESS TO PROTECTED FRESHWATER AREAS
    Sec. 90.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
    (1) "Emergency" means a condition or circumstance in
    which a person reasonably believes that an individual has sustained
    serious bodily injury or is in imminent danger of serious bodily
    injury or that property has sustained significant damage or
    destruction or is in imminent danger of significant damage or
    destruction.
    (2) "Motor vehicle" means any wheeled or tracked
    vehicle, machine, tractor, trailer, or semitrailer propelled or
    drawn by mechanical power and used to transport persons or things.
    (3) "Protected freshwater area" means that portion of
    the bottom, bed, or bank of any navigable river or stream. The term
    does not include that portion of a bed, bottom, or bank that lies
    below tidewater limits or is privately owned.
    Sec. 90.002. OPERATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE IN PROTECTED
    FRESHWATER AREA PROHIBITED. No person may operate a motor vehicle
    in or on a protected freshwater area.
    Sec. 90.003. EXEMPTIONS. (a) Section 90.002 does not apply
    to:
    (1) a state, county, or municipal road right-of-way;
    (2) a private road crossing established before January
    1, 2003; or
    (3) operation of a motor vehicle by:
    (A) a federal, state, or local government
    employee if operation of a motor vehicle is necessary for
    conducting official business;
    (B) an owner of the adjacent uplands and the
    owner's agents, employees, representatives, and lessees for
    reasonable purposes related to usual and customary agricultural
    purposes;
    (C) a person if operation of a motor vehicle is
    necessary to and is authorized by a mineral lease or crossing
    easement granted by the General Land Office under the Natural
    Resources Code;
    (D) a person if operation of a motor vehicle is
    necessary to an activity authorized by Chapter 86; or
    (E) a person in response to an emergency.
    (b) A person exempt under this section who operates a motor
    vehicle in or on a protected freshwater area shall do so in a manner
    that avoids, to the extent reasonably possible, harming or
    disturbing vegetation, wildlife, or wildlife habitat whitin the
    protected freshwater area. A person exempt under this section who
    is crossing a protected freshwater area shall cross by the most
    direct feasible route.
    Sec. 90.004. LANDOWNER RIGHTS. (a) A prescriptive
    easement over private property cannot be created by recreational
    use of a protected freshwater area, including by portage over or
    around barriers, scouting of obstructions, or crossing of private
    property to or from a protected freshwater area.
    (b) Nothing in this section shall limit the right of a
    person to navigate in, on, or around a protected freshwater area.
    Sec. 90.005. PUBLIC ACCESS. (a) Except as otherwise
    allowed by law, no person may restrict, obstruct, intefere with, or
    limit public recreational use of a protected freshwater area.
    (b) This section does not allow the public to use private
    property to gain access to a protected freshwater area without
    permission of the landowner.
    Sec. 90.006. ENFORCEMENT. All peace officers of this state
    shall enforce the provisions of this Act.
    Sec. 90.007. PENALTY. (a) A person commits an offense if
    the person violates Section 90.002 or 90.005.
    (b) Except as provided by Subsection (c), an offense under
    Subsection (a) is a Class C misdemeanor.
    (c) If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this
    section that the defendant was previously convicted two or more
    times under Section 90.002 or 90.005, or Sections 90.002 and
    90.005, on conviction the defendant shall be punished for a Class B
    misdemeanor.
    (d) Each day of a violation under this section is a separate
    offense.
    SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2003.
    Last edited by Rex; 02-10-2003 at 08:38 PM.

  2. #2
    .
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Poth, Tx
    Posts
    4,913
    Now, as I understand, it's up to the individual river authorities to establish "protected" areas. And they can't do so untill September 1. Maybe we can get some off-roaders into the river authorities. Before, only land owners and hippies were interested, now the rest of us may be.

  3. #3
    Rex
    Guest
    And this is why TREAD lightly is stressed so much, eco-nazis eat this stuff up:
    http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/involved..._riverbeds.pdf

  4. #4
    sideways again... redcagepatrol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    H-TOWN
    Posts
    4,270
    that sucks,
    you think the Texas river authority will use this bill? do they have to?
    Scott, FTAC '99
    '62 Nissan Patrol 4-seat Twisted Customs Buggy
    '89 "CJ-7" - Her trail rig
    '05 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 TRD - her daily driver...
    '08 Dodge 2500 Mega Cab 6.7 Diesel 4x4
    scott.schubring@williams.com

    The office sucks - I wanna go wheeling!

  5. #5
    Rex
    Guest
    I still have yet to find a way to launch a boat??? There are no provisions for allowing a trailer in the water.

  6. #6
    sideways again... redcagepatrol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    H-TOWN
    Posts
    4,270
    Originally posted by Rex
    And this is why TREAD lightly is stressed so much, eco-nazis eat this stuff up:
    http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/involved..._riverbeds.pdf
    EVERBODY NEEDS TO READ THIS PRESENTATION AND SEE WHAT THE LANDOWNERS SEE AND ARE PRESENTING.
    Scott, FTAC '99
    '62 Nissan Patrol 4-seat Twisted Customs Buggy
    '89 "CJ-7" - Her trail rig
    '05 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 TRD - her daily driver...
    '08 Dodge 2500 Mega Cab 6.7 Diesel 4x4
    scott.schubring@williams.com

    The office sucks - I wanna go wheeling!

  7. #7
    No progress... bburris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    6,336
    the people on the bottom left of slide 8 look familiar...


    how the hell did they get ahold of that picture???

  8. #8
    . J Cooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where you stay?
    Posts
    5,424
    maybe one of our members is a special ops for TPW

  9. #9
    BigRedFord04
    Guest

    Thumbs down


    stupid greenies

  10. #10
    . J Cooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where you stay?
    Posts
    5,424
    im the club environmental engineering/game warden major, but I dont agree with the bill, I think its crap!! just leave on your TAMOR stickers and I wont fire shots at you

  11. #11
    . J Cooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Where you stay?
    Posts
    5,424
    p.s. its a bunch of tree hungin hippie crap!!

  12. #12
    Rex
    Guest
    Here's another good site on our side, email this to your representative:

    http://198.139.121.46/river_access/index.html

  13. #13
    BigRedFord04
    Guest
    Originally posted by J Cooper
    im the club environmental engineering/game warden majo...
    you're not the only one tree hugger boy....kate is double major in that crap

  14. #14
    Red Sled jmancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    College Station
    Posts
    112
    Just imagine the surprised look on my face, I was at the meeting in Austin TP&W when this presentation was first made!

  15. #15
    Ingenloff
    Guest
    Originally posted by eight
    Since we'll be losing alot of our wheeling places. Is there any chance of getting Fort Hood to open back up? Has anybody checked on getting park lands opened up by way of this.
    At least for the time being, situation being what it is overseas, I'm sure most if not all bases are at ThreatCon Alpha, meaning nobody who doesnt have a military ID and base sticker on their vehicle will be admitted on post. And Ft. Hood being the major training base that it is, is probably like many of the command bases (ex. Hickam and PearlHarbor and other headquarters/command posts) has more than likely been at ThreatCon Alpha for at least a year and half, if not longer....This will more than likely be in effect for sometime. I wouldn't be expecting any wheelin' opportunities there for awhile.




    Originally posted by JCooper
    im the club environmental engineering/game warden major...
    If you're plannin on the game warden academy, you gotta be a major in either wildlife and fisheries or in law enforcement, and seeing as A&M doesn't have a law enforcement major, I'm assuming you're doubling in env. engr and wfsc?........And, btw, Austin, environmentally conscious (sp?) does not equal tree hugger (hippie=tree hugger)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •