aahhh that makes things different...
SHUT UP AND WHEEL
dana 60 out of an 89 F350 is kingpin correct?
and same truck should have sterling rear axle correct?
Tommy Matheaus '06
210-323-2546
2004 F-140 4x4 DD
1990 F-150 4x4 in the works
1992 Jeep Cherokee basterdized
si
I thought it was balljoint, like tates. Actually, Tate's is balljoint and I thought it was that old, so take that as you will. Either way, would a non king pin be a deal breaker with the high strength axles and u joints these days?
Seth Stewart '04
2000 Suburban DD
1995 F150 SAS - Needs more work to sell
1998 GMC pickup - sold
2003 Yukon XL - wrecked/motor donor
1975 Scout - TBD
1976 Scout - parts truck
1972 IH 1310 dually - TBD
196? Scout 800 - 302 roller
Tate's was 92+
Bad on foolsize from my research look in my Bandit thread. Lots of opinions and tech on that shackle design because i looked into the same idea.
It's not street friendly at all, you will need some type of stabilizer more than likely if you plan on driving it safely down the blacktop...
I agreed, muck like revolver and those hinged shackles it just gives you a little more unusable flex. Rubber bushings have enough play that they work great
Originally Posted by afroman006
Originally Posted by afroman006
revolvers don't affect street performance at all, but their usefulness is debatable.
Boats and hoes
Stumble in to the liquor store
With a dollar-fifty for a bottle of wine,
I know just what I'm lookin for
Thunderbird will do just fine.
Asking all 9" gurus.
What years did Ford/Lincoln continentals come with a 9"? Availability? I heard these were the best housings to start with. Any other advice on junk yard 9" finds.
Umm....pickups?
I think the car 9"s would be too much hassle. You'd have to torch all the link bracketry and redrill the axles (they had a 5 on 5" pattern I believe).
BDR
well, I'm tempted to do this. . .
http://www.bc4x4.com/tech/2002/ff9/