View Poll Results: Which engine option

Voters
19. You may not vote on this poll
  • Ecoboost

    3 15.79%
  • 5.0

    8 42.11%
  • All new trucks suck

    5 26.32%
  • I am a whore

    3 15.79%
Results 1 to 15 of 114

Thread: Ecoboost vs 5.0

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Resident Ricer Sparling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,782
    They don't sound bad with stock exhaust, you just wouldn't ever be able to put an aftermarket exhaust for it. Have you test driven an ecoboost?
    '91 Bronco 351w, ZF5, D44 TTB, 9" rear swap with disk brakes, 37" toyos, method wheels, mastercraft seats, A/C and heat

  2. #2
    Come and Take it BroncoJo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    6,039
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparling View Post
    They don't sound bad with stock exhaust, you just wouldn't ever be able to put an aftermarket exhaust for it. Have you test driven an ecoboost?
    Yes and that's the main reason I'm leaning towards one. What are some good points about the 5.0, besides exhaust?


    Also it looks like exhaust, inter cooler, and tune will get you up to ~450hp and over 500 ftlbs. What would it take to get the 5.0 to those numbers?
    Born to Kill

    Quote Originally Posted by RCcola55 View Post
    I just watched a spider dominate a fly on the wall outside, i thought would would travis do? and i did the opposite, spider lives!

  3. #3
    web wheeler FJAggie07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    4,141
    Quote Originally Posted by BroncoJo View Post
    Yes and that's the main reason I'm leaning towards one. What are some good points about the 5.0, besides exhaust?


    Also it looks like exhaust, inter cooler, and tune will get you up to ~450hp and over 500 ftlbs. What would it take to get the 5.0 to those numbers?
    Whipple. Aren't the Ecoboost's still getting a premium over the 5.0's?

  4. #4
    Come and Take it BroncoJo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    6,039
    Quote Originally Posted by FJAggie07 View Post
    Whipple. Aren't the Ecoboost's still getting a premium over the 5.0's?
    Super charger sounds expensive.

    Ford is making more ecoboost these days and the price is almost the exact same. Also I'm noticing a lot more used ecoboost which doesn't make me feel great either.
    Born to Kill

    Quote Originally Posted by RCcola55 View Post
    I just watched a spider dominate a fly on the wall outside, i thought would would travis do? and i did the opposite, spider lives!

  5. #5
    Tommy sucks Sharpe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Corpus Christi
    Posts
    8,826
    I have a 13 F150 4x4 with 5.0L. If you think it's sluggish then owning a truck isn't for you. Hauls enough ass that I never think about it and gets 15 mpg around town with a ****load of idling at work and 17.5 mpg highway doing 80-85. I've had it for 7 months with 20k on it so far. I decided against the ecoboost because it was $2k more and seems like a gimmick to me. Plus it's more parts to break after the warranty expires. I like simple on a DD.
    On the 8th day god created the Super Swamper TSL and said "go forth and kick ass"

  6. #6
    Come and Take it BroncoJo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    6,039
    Quote Originally Posted by Sharpe View Post
    I have a 13 F150 4x4 with 5.0L. If you think it's sluggish then owning a truck isn't for you. Hauls enough ass that I never think about it and gets 15 mpg around town with a ****load of idling at work and 17.5 mpg highway doing 80-85. I've had it for 7 months with 20k on it so far. I decided against the ecoboost because it was $2k more and seems like a gimmick to me. Plus it's more parts to break after the warranty expires. I like simple on a DD.
    Ya a 3/4 ton that gets the same or better mpg you describe with 37's and can do long smokey burn outs has me spoiled.
    Born to Kill

    Quote Originally Posted by RCcola55 View Post
    I just watched a spider dominate a fly on the wall outside, i thought would would travis do? and i did the opposite, spider lives!

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Htown
    Posts
    15,828
    Quote Originally Posted by Sharpe View Post
    I have a 13 F150 4x4 with 5.0L. If you think it's sluggish then owning a truck isn't for you. Hauls enough ass that I never think about it and gets 15 mpg around town with a ****load of idling at work and 17.5 mpg highway doing 80-85. I've had it for 7 months with 20k on it so far. I decided against the ecoboost because it was $2k more and seems like a gimmick to me. Plus it's more parts to break after the warranty expires. I like simple on a DD.
    Agreed. I have a '12 5.0 fx4. Was originally thinking eco-boost. Lu talked me out of it due to the shatty mileage towing and the retarded replacement cost of the engine. The 5.0 makes more power than anything i've ever owned and half the time the traction control is kicking in when you hammer down under 40 mph. I dont regret the 5.0.

    JB is right, if you are driving through houston sitting in traffic you likely will never see the benefits of an ecoboost anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Graystroke View Post
    So you loose, I win!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •