Last edited by Hot Pocket; 05-07-2012 at 04:14 PM.
2010 VW Jetta - DD, 5 Banger, 5 Speed, 1000 Watts of sound!!
1979 Ford Bronco Custom - 400/T18/205.. 35" SSRs, 4" lift, Rancho 5000s, 200 watts of sound!!
Why do that when can reduces the wire and keep from frying one coil.
People that do it your way don't understand wiring and audio ie the Community. And that's bad coming from me.
Last edited by RCcola55; 05-07-2012 at 03:59 PM.
Ryan Clarke![]()
(214)695-7901
Clarke is correct. With two 2 ohm coils, you will want to run themin series and bridge the amp to the combined 4 ohm load. Alternatively, you could run them in 2 ohm stereo, just run a set of speaker wire to each coil. I would run it bridged personally.
This is just one sub correct?
I should take Fred's advice on this kind of thing![]()
Seth Stewart '04
2000 Suburban DD
1995 F150 SAS - Needs more work to sell
1998 GMC pickup - sold
2003 Yukon XL - wrecked/motor donor
1975 Scout - TBD
1976 Scout - parts truck
1972 IH 1310 dually - TBD
196? Scout 800 - 302 roller
For the record:
HP: the first way you described to wire it ("red-red, black black; red-red, black-black) is 2 ohm stereo, which is the same as 4 ohm bridged. With (2) 2 ohm voice coils, there is not really a way to wire it to a single 2 ohm nominal load. It is either 1 ohm (parallel) or 4 ohm (series) Chances are the amp that Travis has is not stable at 1 ohm bridged, so 2 ohm stereo/4 ohm bridged is probably his best bet.
Ryno, one minor thing: When you said, "Wiring them in parallel will be have the ohms of one coil, in series will add the ohms together" you were incorrect on the first part. Wiring them in parallel will show HALF the ohms of one coil. Also, I have no idea what this meant: "Why do that when can (?) reduces the wire and keep from frying one coil.
People that do it your way don't understand wiring and audio (?) ie the Community"
Anywho, just wanted to try and salvage a little accurate info out of this. So far as your last couple of posts, carry on. Though perhaps it would be better suited for the kitchen, or a boxing ring, or Glaucoma clinic.
Seems Travis got it squared away now anyway.
Seth Stewart '04
2000 Suburban DD
1995 F150 SAS - Needs more work to sell
1998 GMC pickup - sold
2003 Yukon XL - wrecked/motor donor
1975 Scout - TBD
1976 Scout - parts truck
1972 IH 1310 dually - TBD
196? Scout 800 - 302 roller
So these aux. fuel tanks that mount in the bed, typically under toolboxes....these jsut drain into the main tank via a T in the filler neck? Maybe I am not up on fluid dynamics, but wouldn't it over flow out the fill cap? Creighton?
92 YJ
04 F-150 4x4
11 F-250 4x4
I think it's illegal to have one gravity feed from the bed to the OEM tank. That's why you see so many with pump handles on top.
Only illegal on a gas motor. If it weren't legal you couldn't get installed by a dealer and nothern tool wouldn't sell them and the t fitting
Originally Posted by afroman006
Originally Posted by afroman006
"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
"It's not cheating if you pay for it"
OK. I'm just going on the experience of trying to help my brother find a place that would install a setup like that in a Dodge diesel about three years ago. Couldn't find a place that would do it without adding the caveat that it would have to be a cash deal and they wouldn't put their name on it. I'd check a TxDOT regulation book before doing that to a brand new truck is all I'm saying.